Irradiación y gestación ¿una verdadera necesidad?
Keywords:
Pregnancy, ionizing radiation, diagnostic imaging, radiation exposure, radiation safety.Abstract
Background: It is known that multiple pathologies during pregnancy require
diagnostic support by imaging, so it is necessary to know when and which
protection techniques should be used. Furthehave the information corresponding to the possible adverse effects of exposure of the
mother and the fetus to ionizing radiation from these diagnostic techniques to make the
right choice, to perform a balance between risk and benefit that prevents exposing the
patient to unnecessary radiation, and to reach a consensus on the procedure between the
medical team and the pregnant woman and her family.
Objective: This review aims to identify the important information reported in recent years
regarding the need for exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic imaging during
pregnancy, as well as its adverse effects on the fetus and the mother, and the usefulness of
various diagnostic methods in different common pathologies in pregnancy.
Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted from January 2018
to January 2021 in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Journal of the American Medical Association
(JAMA) and Google Scholar databases, concerning the MeSH terms (Medical Subject
Headings): pregnancy, radiation (ionizing), diagnostic imaging, radiation exposure,
radiography and tomography, and non-MeSH: gestation, pregnancy, diagnostic imaging
with ionizing radiation, teratogenicity and ionizing radiation. Systematic literature review,
cohort, case-control and case report articles were considered. A total of 37 articles were
included in this review related to the use of ionizing radiation imaging in pregnant women,
as well as its adverse effects, indications and contraindications.
Results and conclusions: The safety of diagnostic imaging used during gestation depends
on the fetal dose absorbed, the stage of fetal development at which they are obtained, and
the type of imaging used. Although the conventional diagnostic methods generally used do
not exceed the limits considered teratogenic, it is advisable to prioritize the use of images
that do not require ionizing radiation. When there is a medical indication for diagnostic
imaging, its performance should not be postponed for fear of the ionizing radiation, but
early diagnosis and treatment of the pathology should be sought in order to improve the
chances of maternal and fetal survival, as well as to reduce morbidity in the pregnant
women.rmore, the professional needs to
References
Bhushan B, Guleria R, Bhushan A, et al. Harmful effects of ionizing radiation. IJRASET. 2019;7:887-889. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/xoqzol93
Mu H, Sun J, Li L, et al. Ionizing radiation exposure: hazards, prevention, and biomarker screening. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(16):15294-15306. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/57rz62v8
Zarghani H, Amouzeshi A. A narrative review on the radiation risk of medical imaging for traumatic pregnant patient and the fetal risks. J Surg Trauma. 2018;6(3):77-85. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/adnxm2mt
Saltybaeva N, Platon A, Poletti P, et al. Radiation dose to the fetus from computed tomography of pregnant patients—Development and Validation of a Web-Based Tool. Invest Radiol. Diciembre de 2020;55(12):762-768. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/r96wsf63
Sensakovic W, Royall I, Hough M, et al. Fetal dosimetry at CT: a primer. RadioGraphics. 2020;40:(4)1061-1070. Disponible en: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.2020190166
Yoon I, Slesinger T. Radiation exposure in pregnancy. En: StatPearls.Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2020; Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/4nffpjrz
Rocha A, Carmo R, Melo R, et al. Imaging evaluation of nonobstetric conditions during pregnancy: what every radiologist should know. Radiol Bras. 2020; 53(3):185-194. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/6ffrvtxj
Mathur S, Pillenahalli R, Fouladirad S, et al. Emergency imaging in pregnancy and lactation. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020;71(3):396-402. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/m068vt1c
Sternick L, Hsu L. Imaging Considerations in Pregnancy. Neurol Clin. Febrero de 2019;37(1):1-16. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/58cw4r7v
Lowe S. Diagnostic imaging in pregnancy: making informed decisions. Obstet Med. 2019; 12(3):116-122. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734637/
Cain U, Gaetke-Udager K, Siegal D, Yablon C. Musculoskeletal injuries in pregnancy. Semin Roentgenol.2021; 56(1):79-89. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/3pmz9q8c
Jamieson D, McVige J. Imaging of neurologic disorders in pregnancy. Neurol Clin. 2020;38(1):37-64. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/3cxdv4yj
Kumar R, De Jesus O. Radiation effects on the fetus. En: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2020; Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/d67dh5z8
Craenen K, Verslegers M, Buset J, et al. A detailed characterization of congenital defects and mortality following moderate X-ray doses during neurulation. Birth Defects Res. 2018;3;110(6):467-482. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bdr2.1161
Chen Z, Cao K, Xia Y, et al. Cellular senescence in ionizing radiation (Review). Oncol Rep. 2019; 42(3):883-894. Disponible en: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/or/42/3/883
Raj M, Mullins J, Chi J, et al. The utility of abdominopelvic CT in pregnant patients with abdominal pain and a negative or inconclusive abdominal MRI. Clin Imaging. 2020;59(1):88-94. Disponible en: https://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/S0899-7071(19)30184-6/fulltext
Pasqual E, Bosch de Basea M, López-Vicente M, et al. Neurodevelopmental effects of low dose ionizing radiation exposure: A systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Environ Int. 2020;136:105371. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412019317076?via%3Dihub
Tang F, Loganovsky K. Low dose or low dose rate ionizing radiation-induced health effect in the human. J Environ Radioact. 2018;192:32-47. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/nekabx9r
Squillaro T, Galano G, De Rosa R, et al. Concise review: the effect of low-dose ionizing radiation on stem cell biology: a contribution to radiation risk. Stem Cells. 2018;36(8):1146-1153. Disponible en: https://stemcellsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/stem.2836
Flanagan E, Bell S. Abdominal Imaging in pregnancy (maternal and foetal risks). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2020; 44-45:101664. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/2bfw4am2
Cohen SL, Wang J, Chan N, et al. Predictors of radiation dose for CT pulmonary angiography in pregnancy across a multihospital integrated healthcare network. Eur J Radiol. 2019;121:108721. Disponible en: https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(19)30371-7/fulltext
Eastwood K, Mohan A. Imaging in pregnancy. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2019;21:255– 262. Disponible en: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tog.12604
Begano D, Soderberg M, Bolejko A. To use or not use patient shielding on pregnant Women undergoing ct pulmonary angiography: a Phantom study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020;2(4):458-465. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/jyehav4
Shur J, Bottomley C, Walton K, et al. Imaging of acute abdominal pain in the third trimester of pregnancy. BMJ. 2018;21;361:k2511. Disponible en: https://www.bmj.com/content/361/bmj.k2511
Lum M, Tsiouris J. MRI safety considerations during pregnancy. Clinical Imaging. 2020; 62:69-75. Disponible en: https://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/S0899-7071(20)30055-3/fulltext
Soosman S, Fananapazir G. Imaging of the non-obstetric acute abdomen in pregnancy. Semin Roentgenol. 2020;55(4):364-372. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/y694jxc8
Herfel E, Hill J, Lieber M. Radiographic evaluation of the pregnant trauma patient: What are we willing to miss? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2018;228:325-328. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/uv2pvs6
Moreno C, Mittal P, Miller F. Nonfetal imaging during pregnancy acute abdomen/pelvis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2020;58(2):363-380. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32044012/
Hendriks B, Schnerr, Milanese G, et al. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography during pregnancy: radiation dose of commonly used protocols and the effect of scan length optimization. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20(2):313-322. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342764/
Harris B, Bishop K, Kuller J. Radiologic aspects of the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 61(2):219-227. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/vggwgrjf
McDermott S, Otrakji A, Flores EJ, et al. Should dual-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography replace single-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography in pregnant and postpartum patients? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018;42(1):25-32. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/pfrmmasz
Morton A, Teasdale S. Review article: investigations and the pregnant woman in the emergency department-part 2: Point-of-care ultrasound, electrocardiography, respiratory function tests and radiology. Emerg Med Australas. 2018;30(6):749-753. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/3is23480
Rotzinger DC, Dunet V, Ilic V, et al. Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a 17-year single-center retrospective MDCT pulmonary angiography study. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(3):1780-1789. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033070/pdf/330_2019_Article_6501.pdf
Lotfipour S, Jason M, Liu V, et al. Latest considerations in diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis during pregnancy. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med.2018;2(2):112–115 Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/152w2pj8
Gao G, Zucconi RL, Zucconi WB. Emergent Neuroimaging During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2018;28(3):419-433. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/svtb7vxy
Predescu D, Boeriu M, Constantin A, et al. Pregnancy and Colorectal Cancer, from Diagnosis to Therapeutical Management-Short Review. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2020;(5):563-578. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/2b4skzrx
Martínez M, Bermejo B, Hernando C, et al. Breast cancer in pregnant patients: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;230:222-227. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/6dwy9bwd
Jafari M, Gity M, Olfatbakhsh A, et al. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: a review of imaging modalities. Int J Cancer Manag. 2018;11(7): e65444. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/59mtlqe2
Arasu, V.A., Kannan, N., Krishnarao, P.M. et al. Imaging the Breast in Pregnant or Lactating Women. Curr Radiol Rep. 2018; 6:10. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40134-018-0267-7#citeas
Guilbaud L, Beghin D, Dhombres F, et al. Pregnancy outcome after first trimester exposure to ionizing radiations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019;232:18-21. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/w23dzzcw
Tolcher M, Clark S. Diagnostic imaging and outcomes for nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 63(2):364-369. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/15unnkij
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-11-10 (3)
- 2025-11-09 (2)
- 2021-04-15 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Scientific and Eduaction Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Atribución – No comercial – Compartir igual: Esta licencia permite a otros distribuir, remezclar, retocar, y crear a partir de tu obra de modo no comercial, siempre y cuando te den crédito y licencien sus nuevas creaciones bajo las mismas condiciones.
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International


