This is an outdated version published on 2025-11-09. Read the most recent version.

Irradiación y gestación ¿una verdadera necesidad?

Authors

  • Angely Rocío Jiménez Insuasti Universidad de Nariño
  • Magda Yamile Ramos Hernández Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas
  • Héctor Javier Espitia Soto Fundación Universitaria Sanitas
  • Liliana Rocío Lagos Vargas Universidad de Boyacá
  • Alvaro Jhonny Cortés Cortés Universidad de Antioquia
  • Pedro Luis Zamarra Ferrer Universidad Metropolitana de Barranquilla

Keywords:

Pregnancy, ionizing radiation, diagnostic imaging, radiation exposure, radiation safety.

Abstract

Background: It is known that multiple pathologies during pregnancy require
diagnostic support by imaging, so it is necessary to know when and which
protection techniques should be used. Furthehave the information corresponding to the possible adverse effects of exposure of the
mother and the fetus to ionizing radiation from these diagnostic techniques to make the
right choice, to perform a balance between risk and benefit that prevents exposing the
patient to unnecessary radiation, and to reach a consensus on the procedure between the
medical team and the pregnant woman and her family.
Objective: This review aims to identify the important information reported in recent years
regarding the need for exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic imaging during
pregnancy, as well as its adverse effects on the fetus and the mother, and the usefulness of
various diagnostic methods in different common pathologies in pregnancy.
Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted from January 2018
to January 2021 in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Journal of the American Medical Association
(JAMA) and Google Scholar databases, concerning the MeSH terms (Medical Subject
Headings): pregnancy, radiation (ionizing), diagnostic imaging, radiation exposure,
radiography and tomography, and non-MeSH: gestation, pregnancy, diagnostic imaging
with ionizing radiation, teratogenicity and ionizing radiation. Systematic literature review,
cohort, case-control and case report articles were considered. A total of 37 articles were
included in this review related to the use of ionizing radiation imaging in pregnant women,
as well as its adverse effects, indications and contraindications.
Results and conclusions: The safety of diagnostic imaging used during gestation depends
on the fetal dose absorbed, the stage of fetal development at which they are obtained, and
the type of imaging used. Although the conventional diagnostic methods generally used do
not exceed the limits considered teratogenic, it is advisable to prioritize the use of images
that do not require ionizing radiation. When there is a medical indication for diagnostic
imaging, its performance should not be postponed for fear of the ionizing radiation, but
early diagnosis and treatment of the pathology should be sought in order to improve the
chances of maternal and fetal survival, as well as to reduce morbidity in the pregnant
women.rmore, the professional needs to

References

Bhushan B, Guleria R, Bhushan A, et al. Harmful effects of ionizing radiation. IJRASET. 2019;7:887-889. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/xoqzol93

Mu H, Sun J, Li L, et al. Ionizing radiation exposure: hazards, prevention, and biomarker screening. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(16):15294-15306. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/57rz62v8

Zarghani H, Amouzeshi A. A narrative review on the radiation risk of medical imaging for traumatic pregnant patient and the fetal risks. J Surg Trauma. 2018;6(3):77-85. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/adnxm2mt

Saltybaeva N, Platon A, Poletti P, et al. Radiation dose to the fetus from computed tomography of pregnant patients—Development and Validation of a Web-Based Tool. Invest Radiol. Diciembre de 2020;55(12):762-768. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/r96wsf63

Sensakovic W, Royall I, Hough M, et al. Fetal dosimetry at CT: a primer. RadioGraphics. 2020;40:(4)1061-1070. Disponible en: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.2020190166

Yoon I, Slesinger T. Radiation exposure in pregnancy. En: StatPearls.Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2020; Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/4nffpjrz

Rocha A, Carmo R, Melo R, et al. Imaging evaluation of nonobstetric conditions during pregnancy: what every radiologist should know. Radiol Bras. 2020; 53(3):185-194. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/6ffrvtxj

Mathur S, Pillenahalli R, Fouladirad S, et al. Emergency imaging in pregnancy and lactation. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020;71(3):396-402. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/m068vt1c

Sternick L, Hsu L. Imaging Considerations in Pregnancy. Neurol Clin. Febrero de 2019;37(1):1-16. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/58cw4r7v

Lowe S. Diagnostic imaging in pregnancy: making informed decisions. Obstet Med. 2019; 12(3):116-122. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734637/

Cain U, Gaetke-Udager K, Siegal D, Yablon C. Musculoskeletal injuries in pregnancy. Semin Roentgenol.2021; 56(1):79-89. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/3pmz9q8c

Jamieson D, McVige J. Imaging of neurologic disorders in pregnancy. Neurol Clin. 2020;38(1):37-64. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/3cxdv4yj

Kumar R, De Jesus O. Radiation effects on the fetus. En: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2020; Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/d67dh5z8

Craenen K, Verslegers M, Buset J, et al. A detailed characterization of congenital defects and mortality following moderate X-ray doses during neurulation. Birth Defects Res. 2018;3;110(6):467-482. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bdr2.1161

Chen Z, Cao K, Xia Y, et al. Cellular senescence in ionizing radiation (Review). Oncol Rep. 2019; 42(3):883-894. Disponible en: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/or/42/3/883

Raj M, Mullins J, Chi J, et al. The utility of abdominopelvic CT in pregnant patients with abdominal pain and a negative or inconclusive abdominal MRI. Clin Imaging. 2020;59(1):88-94. Disponible en: https://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/S0899-7071(19)30184-6/fulltext

Pasqual E, Bosch de Basea M, López-Vicente M, et al. Neurodevelopmental effects of low dose ionizing radiation exposure: A systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Environ Int. 2020;136:105371. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412019317076?via%3Dihub

Tang F, Loganovsky K. Low dose or low dose rate ionizing radiation-induced health effect in the human. J Environ Radioact. 2018;192:32-47. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/nekabx9r

Squillaro T, Galano G, De Rosa R, et al. Concise review: the effect of low-dose ionizing radiation on stem cell biology: a contribution to radiation risk. Stem Cells. 2018;36(8):1146-1153. Disponible en: https://stemcellsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/stem.2836

Flanagan E, Bell S. Abdominal Imaging in pregnancy (maternal and foetal risks). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2020; 44-45:101664. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/2bfw4am2

Cohen SL, Wang J, Chan N, et al. Predictors of radiation dose for CT pulmonary angiography in pregnancy across a multihospital integrated healthcare network. Eur J Radiol. 2019;121:108721. Disponible en: https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(19)30371-7/fulltext

Eastwood K, Mohan A. Imaging in pregnancy. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2019;21:255– 262. Disponible en: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tog.12604

Begano D, Soderberg M, Bolejko A. To use or not use patient shielding on pregnant Women undergoing ct pulmonary angiography: a Phantom study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020;2(4):458-465. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/jyehav4

Shur J, Bottomley C, Walton K, et al. Imaging of acute abdominal pain in the third trimester of pregnancy. BMJ. 2018;21;361:k2511. Disponible en: https://www.bmj.com/content/361/bmj.k2511

Lum M, Tsiouris J. MRI safety considerations during pregnancy. Clinical Imaging. 2020; 62:69-75. Disponible en: https://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/S0899-7071(20)30055-3/fulltext

Soosman S, Fananapazir G. Imaging of the non-obstetric acute abdomen in pregnancy. Semin Roentgenol. 2020;55(4):364-372. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/y694jxc8

Herfel E, Hill J, Lieber M. Radiographic evaluation of the pregnant trauma patient: What are we willing to miss? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2018;228:325-328. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/uv2pvs6

Moreno C, Mittal P, Miller F. Nonfetal imaging during pregnancy acute abdomen/pelvis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2020;58(2):363-380. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32044012/

Hendriks B, Schnerr, Milanese G, et al. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography during pregnancy: radiation dose of commonly used protocols and the effect of scan length optimization. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20(2):313-322. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342764/

Harris B, Bishop K, Kuller J. Radiologic aspects of the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 61(2):219-227. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/vggwgrjf

McDermott S, Otrakji A, Flores EJ, et al. Should dual-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography replace single-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography in pregnant and postpartum patients? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018;42(1):25-32. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/pfrmmasz

Morton A, Teasdale S. Review article: investigations and the pregnant woman in the emergency department-part 2: Point-of-care ultrasound, electrocardiography, respiratory function tests and radiology. Emerg Med Australas. 2018;30(6):749-753. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/3is23480

Rotzinger DC, Dunet V, Ilic V, et al. Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a 17-year single-center retrospective MDCT pulmonary angiography study. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(3):1780-1789. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033070/pdf/330_2019_Article_6501.pdf

Lotfipour S, Jason M, Liu V, et al. Latest considerations in diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis during pregnancy. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med.2018;2(2):112–115 Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/152w2pj8

Gao G, Zucconi RL, Zucconi WB. Emergent Neuroimaging During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2018;28(3):419-433. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/svtb7vxy

Predescu D, Boeriu M, Constantin A, et al. Pregnancy and Colorectal Cancer, from Diagnosis to Therapeutical Management-Short Review. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2020;(5):563-578. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/2b4skzrx

Martínez M, Bermejo B, Hernando C, et al. Breast cancer in pregnant patients: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;230:222-227. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/6dwy9bwd

Jafari M, Gity M, Olfatbakhsh A, et al. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: a review of imaging modalities. Int J Cancer Manag. 2018;11(7): e65444. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/59mtlqe2

Arasu, V.A., Kannan, N., Krishnarao, P.M. et al. Imaging the Breast in Pregnant or Lactating Women. Curr Radiol Rep. 2018; 6:10. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40134-018-0267-7#citeas

Guilbaud L, Beghin D, Dhombres F, et al. Pregnancy outcome after first trimester exposure to ionizing radiations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019;232:18-21. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/w23dzzcw

Tolcher M, Clark S. Diagnostic imaging and outcomes for nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 63(2):364-369. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/15unnkij

Published

2021-04-15 — Updated on 2025-11-09

Versions

How to Cite

Jiménez Insuasti, A. R. ., Ramos Hernández, M. Y. ., Espitia Soto, H. J. ., Lagos Vargas, L. R. ., Cortés Cortés, A. J., & Zamarra Ferrer, P. L. . (2025). Irradiación y gestación ¿una verdadera necesidad?. Scientific and Educational Medical Journal, 1(2), 113-131. Retrieved from https://medicaljournal.com.co/index.php/mj/article/view/30 (Original work published April 15, 2021)

Most read articles by the same author(s)